Computed decision comparison

Spray foam vs fiberglass insulation cost

The modeled upfront totals are $4,221 for Spray foam and $3,106 for Fiberglass scope proxy, a difference of $1,114.

Both calculations use 1,500 sq ft. The fiberglass side uses the general insulation baseline; installed R-value, air sealing, removal, and fire protection remain separate specifications.

Side-by-side upfront cost

Current national model comparison
MeasureSpray foamFiberglass scope proxy
Materials$2,643$1,682
Labor$1,458$1,304
Permits$0$0
Disposal$120$120
Planning range$3,165–$5,698$2,330–$4,193
Typical upfront total$4,221$3,106

Spray foam derivation: Spray-foam baseline at 1,500 sq ft. Fiberglass scope proxy derivation: General insulation baseline at 1,500 sq ft.

Upfront, 10-year, and 20-year totals

HorizonSpray foamFiberglass scope proxy
Upfront$4,221$3,106
10 yearsNot modeled: no sourced lifespanNot modeled: no sourced lifespan
20 yearsNot modeled: no sourced lifespanNot modeled: no sourced lifespan

When each model aligns with the decision

Decision priorityModel comparisonAligned option
Lower modeled upfront totalDifference $1,114Fiberglass scope proxy
Lower labor share34.5% vs 42.0%Spray foam
Narrower published range1.80× vs 1.80×Fiberglass scope proxy

This table compares model properties; it does not recommend a material, system, repair, or replacement.

Open the underlying calculators

Comparison questions

Which option has the lower modeled upfront cost?

Fiberglass scope proxy is lower in the current static default by $1,114. This compares model records, not contractor proposals.

Are 10-year and 20-year replacement costs included?

No sourced lifespan field exists in the shared baseline store, so the site does not invent replacement cycles. Those horizon cells remain explicitly not modeled.

Do both options use the same source system?

Yes. Both are computed from the current baseline store and index snapshots. Any proxy, quantity normalization, or retained legacy factor is disclosed beside the option.