Computed decision comparison

Deck vs patio cost

The modeled upfront totals are $11,413 for Deck and $2,611 for Patio scope proxy, a difference of $8,802.

Both options are normalized to 300 sq ft. The patio side uses the existing landscaping baseline, so excavation, base, drainage, pavers, and slab design are not implied.

Side-by-side upfront cost

Current national model comparison
MeasureDeckPatio scope proxy
Materials$5,900$1,217
Labor$4,603$1,289
Permits$550$0
Disposal$360$105
Planning range$7,989–$18,375$1,828–$4,204
Typical upfront total$11,413$2,611

Deck derivation: Deck baseline at 300 sq ft. Patio scope proxy derivation: Landscaping baseline normalized to 300 sq ft.

Upfront, 10-year, and 20-year totals

HorizonDeckPatio scope proxy
Upfront$11,413$2,611
10 yearsNot modeled: no sourced lifespanNot modeled: no sourced lifespan
20 yearsNot modeled: no sourced lifespanNot modeled: no sourced lifespan

When each model aligns with the decision

Decision priorityModel comparisonAligned option
Lower modeled upfront totalDifference $8,802Patio scope proxy
Lower labor share40.3% vs 49.4%Deck
Narrower published range2.30× vs 2.30×Deck

This table compares model properties; it does not recommend a material, system, repair, or replacement.

Open the underlying calculators

Comparison questions

Which option has the lower modeled upfront cost?

Patio scope proxy is lower in the current static default by $8,802. This compares model records, not contractor proposals.

Are 10-year and 20-year replacement costs included?

No sourced lifespan field exists in the shared baseline store, so the site does not invent replacement cycles. Those horizon cells remain explicitly not modeled.

Do both options use the same source system?

Yes. Both are computed from the current baseline store and index snapshots. Any proxy, quantity normalization, or retained legacy factor is disclosed beside the option.